Share this
About AB-5: Capacity, Rates, and Next Steps for Carriers
by aaronroseman
A trucking capacity environment already stretched to its limits may soon face another layer of compression: A sudden legal pushback against motor carriers in California using independent-contractor drivers to haul freight in the state.
Impact on capacity and rates
A court order reinstating California’s Assembly Bill 5’s (aka A.B.) application to motor carrier operations could snap into place as soon as late May, should efforts by the California Trucking Association come up short in halting a recent court ruling.
Metrics that track the capacity and utilization environment show that domestic trucking capacity is already near maxed out, and that there’s unprecedented pressure in the market and on trucking rates. The economy is expected to continue to gain steam as the recovery continues from the COVID-19 recession last year, and truckbound freight likewise is largely expected to continue its pattern of growth through the spring and summer.
Should motor carriers suddenly have to comply with A.B. 5’s restrictions on the use of independent contractor workers, such as leased owner-operators, it could stand to only further tighten capacity at this critical point in the economic recovery, with commodities and labor shortages already creating strong headwinds.
Even more critical is the chokepoint this ruling could create for drayage operations, who rely heavily on independent contractor drivers. Major ports on the West Coast are already facing a mounting backlog, and they’ve been working at or over capacity for months to clear the jam-up of container ship arrivals.
Any measures to curtail use of independent-contractor drivers at ports will likely, at least in the next few months, only stand to exacerbate these issues and further impede the flow of goods from the ports to across the country.
Politics on the issue aside, A.B.’s sudden implementation for motor carriers could have a pronounced and immediate impact on rates, not only in California but throughout distribution channels.
Background on A.B. 5
Should the restriction take place as expected this month, it would largely block motor carriers’ ability to contract freight to contractor drivers, pushing them instead to use only company employees.
Though many motor carriers had already began working contingency plans in response to California’s 2019-enacted Assembly Bill 5 (aka A.B. 5), carriers of all sizes in the state still do lean on independent-contractor drivers, those that own their own truck and/or trailer and haul freight on a contracted basis for just one or a handful of other, larger motor carriers. It’s a common practice by motor carriers across the country and across applications and segments.
California’s legislature enacted the law in late 2019, after the state’s Supreme Court instituted the so-called ABC test for determining whether a company can use independent-contractor workers. The second point, the so-called B-prong of the ABC test, blocks companies from hiring independent contractor workers unless the work is “outside the usual course of the hiring entity’s business.” That prong of the ABC test is largely interpreted as preventing motor carriers from hiring independent-contractor drivers to haul loads, since carriers’ “usual course of business” is hauling freight.
State trucking associations in California have been fighting the law’s enactment, arguing it goes too far in regulating the use of independent contractors in trucking. Proponents of A.B. 5’s application to trucking argue that the law is necessary to prevent abuse of the independent-contractor model.
State associations have also said they’ve been active in transitioning former independent-contractor drivers into full-fledged DOT-registered motor carriers, meaning they could operate under their own DOT authority as an independent motor carrier. Thus, they could accept loads from other carrier’s brokerage operations as a way to comply with the law.
Next steps in California
The saga surrounding this issue in California, specifically, still must play out fully in court — a process that likely will take place over the next 2-3 years.
Trucking, and motor carriers, had received a court-ordered reprieve from the law in January 2020. A preliminary injunction issued by the U.S. District Court in Southern California blocked the state from enforcing the law on motor carriers until the California Trucking Associations’ lawsuit against A.B. 5 is fully adjudicated. However, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals this month lifted that injunction, meaning that motor carriers must comply with the law while the broader lawsuit is adjudicated.
CTA is appealing that decision. Meanwhile, the underlying lawsuit is set to be heard by the U.S. District Court in Southern California. Any decision there likely will be appealed to the 9th Circuit appellate court again. Any 9th Circuit decision will likely then be appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court for possible final ruling.
Impact on Loadsmart carriers and shippers
Loadsmart intends to maintain its relationship with carriers and shippers and help both parties work through whatever issues may arise from this legal change in California. As always, our carrier and shipper support centers are open, and representatives can help answer questions on any loads or contracts.
If you’ve enjoyed these insights and have questions or comments, start a conversation with us on your loadboard, resource center, or send an email to capacitydevelopment@loadsmart.com
DISCOVER YOUR LOADS
About Loadsmart
We are industry veterans and data-scientists using innovative technology to fearlessly reinvent the future of freight. As the ‘nerds of logistics’, we seek intelligence in data to solve deep-rooted inefficiencies in the industry. We give shippers, brokers and carriers access to our data connections (linking supply and demand) and suite of award-winning solutions to strike the perfect balance of cost and service. We’re creating a more efficient and environmentally responsible way to move more with less. For more information, please visit: https://loadsmart.com
Share this
- Blog (95)
- Shipper (88)
- Market Trends (85)
- Enterprise Shipper (69)
- Carrier (66)
- News (57)
- Data Insights (51)
- Thought Leadership (44)
- SMB Shipper (38)
- Our Partners (34)
- Warehouse (31)
- Product Updates (29)
- Mode Optimization (25)
- ShipperGuide TMS (22)
- Mid-Market Shipper (18)
- Opendock (17)
- Loadsmart (13)
- Brokerage Services (12)
- Case Study (12)
- Managed Transportation (9)
- Video (8)
- FreightIntel AI (5)
- Award (4)
- Instant Execution (4)
- Asset (3)
- Food and Beverage (3)
- Freight Management (3)
- Logistics Solutions (3)
- eBook (3)
- Podcast (2)
- Paper Packaging (1)
- Retail (1)
- Transportation Management System (1)
- November 2024 (3)
- October 2024 (11)
- September 2024 (11)
- August 2024 (5)
- July 2024 (5)
- June 2024 (9)
- May 2024 (7)
- April 2024 (6)
- March 2024 (2)
- February 2024 (2)
- January 2024 (5)
- December 2023 (6)
- November 2023 (2)
- October 2023 (12)
- September 2023 (5)
- August 2023 (3)
- July 2023 (4)
- June 2023 (10)
- May 2023 (5)
- April 2023 (5)
- March 2023 (7)
- February 2023 (5)
- January 2023 (7)
- December 2022 (4)
- November 2022 (13)
- October 2022 (4)
- September 2022 (7)
- August 2022 (11)
- July 2022 (6)
- June 2022 (5)
- May 2022 (2)
- April 2022 (4)
- March 2022 (6)
- February 2022 (7)
- January 2022 (9)
- December 2021 (3)
- November 2021 (5)
- October 2021 (7)
- September 2021 (2)
- August 2021 (2)
- July 2021 (4)
- June 2021 (6)
- May 2021 (6)
- April 2021 (5)
- March 2021 (8)
- February 2021 (3)
- January 2021 (3)
- December 2020 (7)
- November 2020 (9)
- October 2020 (7)
- September 2020 (6)
- August 2020 (10)
- July 2020 (8)
- June 2020 (3)
- May 2020 (1)
- April 2020 (2)
- March 2020 (2)
- February 2020 (1)
- January 2020 (1)
- November 2019 (2)
- October 2019 (1)
- September 2019 (2)
- August 2019 (3)
- July 2019 (2)
- June 2019 (2)
- May 2019 (3)
- March 2019 (1)
- February 2019 (3)
- December 2018 (1)
- November 2018 (2)
- October 2018 (1)
- September 2018 (2)
- August 2018 (1)
- July 2018 (1)
- June 2018 (3)
- May 2018 (4)
- April 2018 (1)
- February 2018 (1)
- January 2018 (4)
- November 2017 (1)
- October 2017 (2)
- June 2017 (1)
- May 2017 (2)
- April 2017 (1)
- February 2017 (1)
- January 2017 (2)
- October 2016 (1)
- August 2016 (1)
- July 2016 (2)
- June 2016 (1)
- March 2016 (1)
- January 2016 (1)
- December 2015 (3)
- November 2015 (2)
- October 2015 (6)
- July 2015 (1)
- June 2015 (1)
- April 2015 (2)
- March 2015 (13)
- February 2015 (17)
- January 2015 (15)
- December 2014 (35)
- November 2014 (26)
- October 2014 (60)
- September 2014 (2)