Share this
Findings from Loadsmart / FreightWaves Survey: Shippers are still looking backwards
by jpallmerine
Ensuring Your Transportation Costs Are Competitive in the Absence of Reliable Benchmarks
If logistics professionals have learned anything in the past year and a half, it’s that global supply chains have been deeply affected and changed forever by the pandemic. This fact makes one of the findings from a recent survey that Loadsmart co-sponsored with FreightWaves all the more interesting. In it, an overwhelming majority of shippers (75%) indicated they rely on their historical rates as benchmarks for measuring their present and future transportation spend.
(You can watch a video summary and analysis of the survey here: Driving Blind: Shippers Make Decisions Informed By The Wrong Data)
The obvious problem with doing so is that today’s market conditions are unlike any existing in the past. And, as is argued in the video analysis, what we’re dealing with today is simply an acceleration of where things were already heading. In other words, there is no going back to the way things were for the logistics industry in any sense.
No Looking Back
This is especially true for shipping rates. It’s a clear signal that looking to the past to benchmark rates is a mistake. And, with shipping costs climbing at a rate of 50+% year-over-year, reliance on costs from a vastly different period (even if it was just a year or two ago) can do more harm than good.
So without its own data as an obvious and trustworthy way to benchmark, but a universal agreement that benchmarking has value (another finding from the survey), what’s a shipper to do? Companies cannot fly blind when it comes to managing their costs in the long term. Even when market conditions are tight like they are now, managing costs is still a necessity.
What Other Data Sources Are Out There?
We also learned from the survey a few other ways that companies are attempting to benchmark their rates as this chart illustrates.
A common thread within all of these data sources is that they rely on information from the past. Or they do not come with the assurance of capacity. Taken all together, it is understandable that companies will be skeptical of the value of benchmarking if their available options do not come with the guarantee of capacity or the feeling they’ll be able to procure better rates.
Technology, Data, Rates, and Capacity
The clear goal for companies is to find reliable carriers at competitive market rates when they’re needed. Knowing what’s competitive by looking back doesn’t work. The companies thriving right now (they are out there) have figured out the only reliable benchmark is knowing what the cost is for capacity that is available now. That’s not as hard to do as it may seem. This type of visibility comes from moving past the mindset of doing things the ‘old way’ – such as benchmarking against last year’s rates, running annual RFPs, or using a static routing guide.
None of these methods work today. Progressive shippers are finding success with new tactics, such as establishing TMS integrations with other technologies that provide dynamic pricing integrations, which connect to real-time market rates backed with guaranteed capacity.
The most useful data sources help shippers find trucks and allow them to benchmark for the assurance their logistics costs are being well-managed. Click here to learn more about how Loadsmart’s Dynamic Pricing can connect to your TMS and improve the efficiency of your shipping operation.
About Loadsmart
We are industry veterans and data-scientists using innovative technology to fearlessly reinvent the future of freight. As the ‘nerds of logistics’, we seek intelligence in data to solve deep-rooted inefficiencies in the industry. We give shippers, brokers and carriers access to our data connections (linking supply and demand) and suite of award-winning solutions to strike the perfect balance of cost and service. We’re creating a more efficient and environmentally responsible way to move more with less. For more information, please visit: https://loadsmart.com
Share this
- Blog (95)
- Shipper (88)
- Market Trends (85)
- Enterprise Shipper (69)
- Carrier (66)
- News (57)
- Data Insights (51)
- Thought Leadership (44)
- SMB Shipper (38)
- Our Partners (34)
- Warehouse (31)
- Product Updates (29)
- Mode Optimization (25)
- ShipperGuide TMS (22)
- Mid-Market Shipper (18)
- Opendock (17)
- Loadsmart (13)
- Brokerage Services (12)
- Case Study (12)
- Managed Transportation (9)
- Video (8)
- FreightIntel AI (5)
- Award (4)
- Instant Execution (4)
- Asset (3)
- Food and Beverage (3)
- Freight Management (3)
- Logistics Solutions (3)
- eBook (3)
- Podcast (2)
- Paper Packaging (1)
- Retail (1)
- Transportation Management System (1)
- November 2024 (3)
- October 2024 (11)
- September 2024 (11)
- August 2024 (5)
- July 2024 (5)
- June 2024 (9)
- May 2024 (7)
- April 2024 (6)
- March 2024 (2)
- February 2024 (2)
- January 2024 (5)
- December 2023 (6)
- November 2023 (2)
- October 2023 (12)
- September 2023 (5)
- August 2023 (3)
- July 2023 (4)
- June 2023 (10)
- May 2023 (5)
- April 2023 (5)
- March 2023 (7)
- February 2023 (5)
- January 2023 (7)
- December 2022 (4)
- November 2022 (13)
- October 2022 (4)
- September 2022 (7)
- August 2022 (11)
- July 2022 (6)
- June 2022 (5)
- May 2022 (2)
- April 2022 (4)
- March 2022 (6)
- February 2022 (7)
- January 2022 (9)
- December 2021 (3)
- November 2021 (5)
- October 2021 (7)
- September 2021 (2)
- August 2021 (2)
- July 2021 (4)
- June 2021 (6)
- May 2021 (6)
- April 2021 (5)
- March 2021 (8)
- February 2021 (3)
- January 2021 (3)
- December 2020 (7)
- November 2020 (9)
- October 2020 (7)
- September 2020 (6)
- August 2020 (10)
- July 2020 (8)
- June 2020 (3)
- May 2020 (1)
- April 2020 (2)
- March 2020 (2)
- February 2020 (1)
- January 2020 (1)
- November 2019 (2)
- October 2019 (1)
- September 2019 (2)
- August 2019 (3)
- July 2019 (2)
- June 2019 (2)
- May 2019 (3)
- March 2019 (1)
- February 2019 (3)
- December 2018 (1)
- November 2018 (2)
- October 2018 (1)
- September 2018 (2)
- August 2018 (1)
- July 2018 (1)
- June 2018 (3)
- May 2018 (4)
- April 2018 (1)
- February 2018 (1)
- January 2018 (4)
- November 2017 (1)
- October 2017 (2)
- June 2017 (1)
- May 2017 (2)
- April 2017 (1)
- February 2017 (1)
- January 2017 (2)
- October 2016 (1)
- August 2016 (1)
- July 2016 (2)
- June 2016 (1)
- March 2016 (1)
- January 2016 (1)
- December 2015 (3)
- November 2015 (2)
- October 2015 (6)
- July 2015 (1)
- June 2015 (1)
- April 2015 (2)
- March 2015 (13)
- February 2015 (17)
- January 2015 (15)
- December 2014 (35)
- November 2014 (26)
- October 2014 (60)
- September 2014 (2)